We can't say anything concrete about how Simon Birmingham voted on increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills
How Simon Birmingham voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliament, particularly the Senate, should send bills to committees for inquiry to ensure that all bills are properly scrutinised before they pass through parliament to become law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Simon Birmingham could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Simon Birmingham on this policy.
| Division | Simon Birmingham | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Simon Birmingham could have attended.
| Division | Simon Birmingham | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Feb 2022, 11:44 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into two bills |
absent | Yes |
10th Feb 2022, 11:31 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into three electoral bills |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2021, 12:39 PM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 |
absent | No |
17th Jun 2021, 12:36 PM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Simon Birmingham was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.