Compare how Simon Birmingham and Anthony Chisholm voted on increasing investment in the coal industry
Simon Birmingham
Liberal Party Senator for SA since May 2007
Anthony Chisholm
Australian Labor Party Senator for Queensland since July 2016
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase its investment in and support for the Australian coal industry
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Simon Birmingham or Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Simon Birmingham and Anthony Chisholm on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Simon Birmingham | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which either Simon Birmingham or Anthony Chisholm could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".