We can't say anything concrete about how Penny Wong voted on targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups
How Penny Wong voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should work to address homelessness in specific vulnerable groups, such as older women and First Nations people
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups” which Penny Wong could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Wong on this policy.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Nov 2024, 1:12 PM – Senate Help to Buy Bill 2023, Help to Buy (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Prioritise certain groups |
absent | Yes |
26th Nov 2024, 1:08 PM – Senate Help to Buy Bill 2023, Help to Buy (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Extend and focus on specific populations |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups” which Penny Wong could have attended.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2017, 4:44 PM – Senate Motions - Older People and Homelessness - Increase funding |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2017, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Homelessness - LGBTIQ community |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Penny Wong was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.