We can't say anything concrete about how Penny Wong voted on increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services
How Penny Wong voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding to private bodies that provide certain services otherwise provided by the government, such as education and health (for example, private universities)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services” which Penny Wong could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Wong on this policy.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing government funding to private bodies that provide certain services” which Penny Wong could have attended.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Jun 2015, 12:30 PM – Senate Motions - Higher Education - Extend funding to private universities and colleges |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Penny Wong was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.