We can't say anything concrete about how Penny Wong voted on a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability
How Penny Wong voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission to investigate and report on violence and abuse against people with disability in light of the the disproportionately high number of reports of abuse of Australians with a disability by people who are meant to care for them
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which Penny Wong could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Wong on this policy.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse against People with Disability” which Penny Wong could have attended.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Feb 2019, 12:13 PM – Senate Motions - Disability Services - Establish a royal commission |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2018, 4:25 PM – Senate Motions - Disability Services - Establish a royal commission |
absent | Yes |
19th Sep 2018, 4:47 PM – Senate Motions - Aged Care - Royal Commission and people with disability |
absent | Yes |
29th Mar 2017, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Institutional Care - For a royal commission |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Penny Wong was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.