We can't say anything concrete about how Penny Wong voted on time-based restrictions on alcohol sales and venue entry
How Penny Wong voted compared to someone who agrees that venues shouldn't be allowed to accept new customers and alcohol sales should be forbidden after specified times
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for time-based restrictions on alcohol sales and venue entry” which Penny Wong could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Wong on this policy.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for time-based restrictions on alcohol sales and venue entry” which Penny Wong could have attended.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Feb 2016, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions — Alcohol-Fuelled Violence |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Penny Wong was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.