We can't say anything concrete about how Penny Wong voted on increasing funding for legal aid
How Penny Wong voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Penny Wong could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Wong on this policy.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Penny Wong could have attended.
| Division | Penny Wong | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2024, 6:08 PM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 5) 2023-2024 and four others - Second Reading - Increase funding for legal assistance services |
absent | Yes |
29th Mar 2017, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Services - Commit funding |
absent | Yes |
26th Mar 2015, 1:18 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Aid- Increase funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Penny Wong was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.