We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Minchin voted on federal government action on animal & plant extinctions
How Nick Minchin voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Nick Minchin could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Minchin on this policy.
| Division | Nick Minchin | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Nick Minchin could have attended.
| Division | Nick Minchin | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Sep 2009, 3:44 PM – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Management plans |
absent | Yes |
19th Mar 2009, 9:49 AM – Senate Motions - Protect the Swift Parrot - Deliberate Actions and Recovery Plan |
absent | Yes |
13th Aug 2007, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Yangtze River Dolphin - Implement management plans |
absent | Yes |
7th Sep 2006, 10:10 AM – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Legislation to protect threatened species |
absent | Yes |
28th Mar 2006, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Wedge-Tailed Eagle - Protect habitat |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Minchin was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.