We can't say anything concrete about how Natasha Stott Despoja voted on increasing the diversity of media ownership
How Natasha Stott Despoja voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should use regulation to increase the diversity of publishers and broadcasters in Australia's media industry by, for example, setting a threshold for the maximum market share of any one company.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the diversity of media ownership” which Natasha Stott Despoja could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Natasha Stott Despoja on this policy.
| Division | Natasha Stott Despoja | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2006, 6:13 PM – Senate Broadcasting Services Amendment (Media Ownership) Bill 2006 and three related bill - Second Reading - Agree with the main idea of the bills |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the diversity of media ownership” which Natasha Stott Despoja could have attended.
| Division | Natasha Stott Despoja | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Natasha Stott Despoja was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.