We can't say anything concrete about how Marielle Smith voted on assisting Australians trying to return from overseas
How Marielle Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should assist returning Australians stranded overseas due to COVID-19 by, for example, increasing the numbers of permitted arrivals under international flight caps and targetting price gauging so that return airline tickets are affordable
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for assisting Australians trying to return from overseas” which Marielle Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marielle Smith on this policy.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for assisting Australians trying to return from overseas” which Marielle Smith could have attended.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
23rd Jun 2021, 10:44 AM – Senate Biosecurity Amendment (Strengthening Penalties) Bill 2021 - in Committee |
absent | Yes |
11th May 2021, 5:06 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Covid-19: Quarantine - Help Australians in India |
absent | Yes |
15th Feb 2021, 5:49 PM – Senate Motions - COVID-19 - Repatriation |
absent | Yes |
30th Nov 2020, 4:45 PM – Senate Motions - Covid-19: Repatriation - Bring stranded Australians home |
absent | Yes |
12th Nov 2020, 12:09 PM – Senate Documents - Covid-19: International Travel - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
10th Nov 2020 – Senate Motions - Covid-19; International Travel - Bring Australians home |
absent | Yes |
6th Oct 2020, 5:02 PM – Senate Motions - Covid-19 - Repatriation |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Marielle Smith has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.