We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on live animal export
How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Sep 2018, 11:35 AM – Senate Animal Export Legislation Amendment (Ending Long-Haul Live Sheep Exports) Bill 2018 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2018, 5:01 PM – Senate Documents - Live Animal Exports - Phase out |
absent | No |
26th Jun 2018, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - Compensation and orderly phase out |
absent | No |
8th Feb 2018, 12:17 PM – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - Transition away from |
absent | No |
15th Jun 2017, 12:22 PM – Senate Motions - Live Animal Exports - Ban |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Lucy Gichuhi has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.