We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on reducing air pollution
How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop policies and legislation that reduce air pollution, including vehicle emissions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.
Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.
Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
27th Nov 2018, 1:58 PM – Senate Road Vehicle Standards Bill 2018 and others - Second Reading - Reduce vehicle emissions |
absent | Yes |
15th Aug 2018, 5:21 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Product Emissions Standards (Excise) Charges Regulations 2018, Product Emissions Standards (Customs) Charges Regulations 2018 - Disallow |
absent | No |
10th May 2018, 12:44 PM – Senate Interstate Road Transport Legislation (Repeal) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Address emissions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lucy Gichuhi was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.