We can't say anything concrete about how Lucy Gichuhi voted on banning new thermal coal mines
How Lucy Gichuhi voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should put a ban on new thermal coal mines opening in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning new thermal coal mines” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lucy Gichuhi on this policy.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning new thermal coal mines” which Lucy Gichuhi could have attended.
| Division | Lucy Gichuhi | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Nov 2018, 3:55 PM – Senate Motions - Coalmines in the Galilee Basin - Refuse |
absent | Yes |
27th Jun 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - More coal-fired power stations |
absent | No |
15th Feb 2018, 12:07 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Action |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lucy Gichuhi was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.