We can't say anything concrete about how Karen Grogan voted on increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills
How Karen Grogan voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliament, particularly the Senate, should send bills to committees for inquiry to ensure that all bills are properly scrutinised before they pass through parliament to become law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Karen Grogan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Karen Grogan on this policy.
| Division | Karen Grogan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Karen Grogan could have attended.
| Division | Karen Grogan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Feb 2022, 11:44 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into two bills |
Yes | Yes |
10th Feb 2022, 11:31 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into three electoral bills |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Karen Grogan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.