We can't say anything concrete about how Don Farrell voted on building community climate change resilience
How Don Farrell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should invest in efforts to increase community resilience to extreme weather events, such as bushfires and floods
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for building community climate change resilience” which Don Farrell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Don Farrell on this policy.
| Division | Don Farrell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for building community climate change resilience” which Don Farrell could have attended.
| Division | Don Farrell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2019, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Drought |
absent | Yes |
13th Nov 2019, 4:49 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Bushfires - Climate Change |
absent | Yes |
17th Oct 2019, 10:51 AM – Senate Emergency Response Fund Bill 2019 and another - Second Reading - Invest |
absent | Yes |
10th Sep 2019, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Queensland - Bushfires |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Don Farrell was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.