We can't say anything concrete about how Don Farrell voted on reducing air pollution
How Don Farrell voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop policies and legislation that reduce air pollution, including vehicle emissions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Don Farrell could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Don Farrell on this policy.
| Division | Don Farrell | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Don Farrell could have attended.
| Division | Don Farrell | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th May 2020, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - Transport Infrastructure - Funding for active transport (cycling, walking etc) |
absent | Yes |
27th Nov 2018, 1:58 PM – Senate Road Vehicle Standards Bill 2018 and others - Second Reading - Reduce vehicle emissions |
Yes | Yes |
15th Aug 2018, 5:21 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Product Emissions Standards (Excise) Charges Regulations 2018, Product Emissions Standards (Customs) Charges Regulations 2018 - Disallow |
absent | No |
10th May 2018, 12:44 PM – Senate Interstate Road Transport Legislation (Repeal) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Address emissions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Don Farrell has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.