Compare how David Fawcett and Mark Bishop voted on using natural resource wealth for the benefit of all Australians

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for using natural resource wealth for the benefit of all Australians” which either David Fawcett or Mark Bishop could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett and Mark Bishop on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Fawcett	Mark Bishop	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for using natural resource wealth for the benefit of all Australians” which either David Fawcett or Mark Bishop could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	David Fawcett	Mark Bishop	Supporters vote
25th Mar 2014, 1:51 PM – Senate Minerals Resource Rent Tax Repeal and Other Measures Bill 2013 - Second Reading - Share mining boom benefits	No	No	Yes
22nd Mar 2012, 1:29 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Use Queensland mining wealth to benefit all Queenslanders	No	No	Yes