We can't say anything concrete about how Dana Wortley voted on increasing federal government support for childcare
How Dana Wortley voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase financial support for childcare and early childhood eduction by, for example, supporting increased wages for workers and providing grants for not-for-profit community child care initiatives
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which Dana Wortley could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dana Wortley on this policy.
| Division | Dana Wortley | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing federal government support for childcare” which Dana Wortley could have attended.
| Division | Dana Wortley | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Mar 2009, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Child Care - Not-for-profit government-supported childcare |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2006, 3:44 PM – Senate Motions - Child Care - Increase wages for workers |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Dana Wortley has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.