We can't say anything concrete about how Bob Day voted on maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
How Bob Day voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase the amount of funding allocated to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which Bob Day could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Day on this policy.
| Division | Bob Day | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which Bob Day could have attended.
| Division | Bob Day | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Sep 2014, 3:39 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Animal Health Laboratory - Fund CSIRO |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Bob Day has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.