We can't say anything concrete about how Barbara Pocock voted on increasing funding for public good research
How Barbara Pocock voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should invest more in research for the public good in the tertiary sector, including by supporting the PhD candidates undertaking it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for public good research” which Barbara Pocock could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Barbara Pocock on this policy.
| Division | Barbara Pocock | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for public good research” which Barbara Pocock could have attended.
| Division | Barbara Pocock | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
6th Mar 2023, 6:22 PM – Senate Higher Education Support Amendment (Australia's Economic Accelerator) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Support pure research |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Barbara Pocock has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.