We can't say anything concrete about how Annette Hurley voted on stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation
How Annette Hurley voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make it harder for individuals and corporations to avoid or aggressively minimise their Australian tax obligations and take part in international efforts to keep track of these individuals and corporations by sharing income and asset information
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which Annette Hurley could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Annette Hurley on this policy.
| Division | Annette Hurley | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stopping tax avoidance or aggressive tax minimisation” which Annette Hurley could have attended.
| Division | Annette Hurley | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Nov 2009, 4:49 PM – Senate Motions - Overseas Tax Havens - Deplorable |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Annette Hurley has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.