We can't say anything concrete about how Anne Ruston voted on recognising the State of Palestine
How Anne Ruston voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should officially recognise the State of Palestine
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Ruston on this policy.
Division | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising the State of Palestine” which Anne Ruston could have attended.
Division | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
25th Jun 2024, 5:08 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle East: Occupied Palestinian Territories - Recognise the State of Palestine |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anne Ruston was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.