We can't say anything concrete about how Anne Ruston voted on Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs)
How Anne Ruston voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs) that impose conditions on a person who has been convicted of certain terrorist offences and subsequently released, if the court is satisfied that there is an unacceptable risk that the person will commit certain serious terrorism offences in the community
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs)” which Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Ruston on this policy.
| Division | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2021, 9:50 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (High Risk Terrorist Offenders) Bill 2021 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Extended Supervision Orders (ESOs)” which Anne Ruston could have attended.
| Division | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anne Ruston was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.