We can't say anything concrete about how Anne Ruston voted on increasing information sharing between state and federal government agencies
How Anne Ruston voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should work with its state and territory counterparts to ensure more effective information sharing between their agencies by, for example, storing citizens' data in central databases or creating new schemes for information exchange
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing information sharing between state and federal government agencies” which Anne Ruston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Ruston on this policy.
| Division | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing information sharing between state and federal government agencies” which Anne Ruston could have attended.
| Division | Anne Ruston | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2020, 11:30 AM – Senate National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Strengthening Banning Orders) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Implement recommendations 7 & 8 |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Anne Ruston has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.