We can't say anything concrete about how Andrew McLachlan voted on banning pay secrecy clauses
How Andrew McLachlan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban pay secrecy clauses so that employees can freely discuss and compare their pay with others
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which Andrew McLachlan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Andrew McLachlan on this policy.
| Division | Andrew McLachlan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2022, 6:46 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning pay secrecy clauses” which Andrew McLachlan could have attended.
| Division | Andrew McLachlan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Andrew McLachlan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.