We can't say anything concrete about how Amanda Vanstone voted on recognising local government in the Constitution
How Amanda Vanstone voted compared to someone who agrees that local government should be recognised in the Australian Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Amanda Vanstone on this policy.
| Division | Amanda Vanstone | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Amanda Vanstone could have attended.
| Division | Amanda Vanstone | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Sep 2006, 9:56 AM – Senate Motions - Local Government in Australia - Referendum |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Amanda Vanstone has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.