Compare how Alex Gallacher and David Feeney voted on increasing restrictions on gambling

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Alex Gallacher or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Alex Gallacher and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Alex Gallacher David Feeney Supporters vote

27th Mar 2018, 12:06 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Gambling ads

No - Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Alex Gallacher or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Alex Gallacher David Feeney Supporters vote

29th Jul 2019, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - A new inquiry

No - Yes

13th Feb 2019, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Introduced restrictions

No - Yes

26th Mar 2018, 8:51 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Prohibit betting on lottery outcome

No - Yes

14th Feb 2018, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Phase out poker machines

No - Yes

29th Mar 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Apply the National Consumer Protection Framework

No - Yes

8th Feb 2017, 5:11 PM – Representatives Interactive Gambling Amendment Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Phase out ads relating to betting or gambling

- Yes Yes

12th Sep 2016, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Gambling - Against gambling advertising

absent - Yes

22nd Sep 2014, 6:08 PM – Senate Omnibus Repeal Day (Autumn 2014) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Interactive Gambling Act and ACMA

Yes - No

5th Mar 2014, 12:27 PM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 — In Committee — Keep schedule 1 (on gambling) unchanged

Yes - No

9th Feb 2012, 12:55 PM – Senate Documents — Gambling; Order for the Production of Documents

No No Yes