We can't say anything concrete about how Sue Boyce voted on high speed rail on the east coast
How Sue Boyce voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be a high speed rail network connecting the major cities on the east coast of Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for high speed rail on the east coast” which Sue Boyce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Boyce on this policy.
| Division | Sue Boyce | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for high speed rail on the east coast” which Sue Boyce could have attended.
| Division | Sue Boyce | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th May 2010, 4:09 PM – Senate Motions - High Speed Rail Network - Feasibility study |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sue Boyce was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.