We can't say anything concrete about how Santo Santoro voted on increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators
How Santo Santoro voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal governmnet should increase parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators, such as legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and/or other allowances like the printing allowance
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Santo Santoro could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Santo Santoro on this policy.
| Division | Santo Santoro | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Santo Santoro could have attended.
| Division | Santo Santoro | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Sep 2006, 12:27 PM – Senate Motions - Motion for Disallowance - Parliamentary printing allowances |
absent | No |
5th Sep 2006, 6:25 PM – Senate Motions - Remuneration and Allowances - Pay rise |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Santo Santoro was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.