We can't say anything concrete about how Santo Santoro voted on protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats
How Santo Santoro voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should protect threatened forest and bushland habitats from logging.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Santo Santoro could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Santo Santoro on this policy.
| Division | Santo Santoro | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which Santo Santoro could have attended.
| Division | Santo Santoro | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Nov 2006, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Logging in Tasmania’s Weld River Valley - Halt logging |
absent | Yes |
28th Mar 2006, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Wedge-Tailed Eagle - Protect habitat |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Santo Santoro was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.