We can't say anything concrete about how Russell Trood voted on funding the national school chaplaincy program
How Russell Trood voted compared to someone who agrees that The federal government should continue to fund the National School Chaplaincy Program (NSCP) to fund chaplains in Australian primary and secondary schools
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for funding the national school chaplaincy program” which Russell Trood could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Russell Trood on this policy.
| Division | Russell Trood | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for funding the national school chaplaincy program” which Russell Trood could have attended.
| Division | Russell Trood | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Nov 2009, 4:25 PM – Senate Motions - National School Chaplaincy Program - Continue program |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Russell Trood was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.