We can't say anything concrete about how Penny Allman-Payne voted on ending immigration detention on Manus Island
How Penny Allman-Payne voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Manus Regional Processing Centre and stop all Manus-based processing of people's claims for asylum
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Penny Allman-Payne could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Allman-Payne on this policy.
| Division | Penny Allman-Payne | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Manus Island” which Penny Allman-Payne could have attended.
| Division | Penny Allman-Payne | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Mar 2023, 10:01 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Evacuation to Safety) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Penny Allman-Payne has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.