We can't say anything concrete about how Nita Green voted on an Australian bill of rights
How Nita Green voted compared to someone who agrees that the government should introduce an Australian bill of rights either as a piece of legislation or as part of the Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Nita Green could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nita Green on this policy.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Nita Green could have attended.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Dec 2019, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Racism - Introduce an Australian Charter of Rights |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nita Green has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.