We can't say anything concrete about how Nita Green voted on federal action on public housing
How Nita Green voted compared to someone who agrees that even though public housing is controlled by our state governments, the federal government should also take action to increase the availability of affordable public housing around Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which Nita Green could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nita Green on this policy.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Sep 2023, 12:22 PM – Senate Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2023, 10:55 AM – Senate Housing Australia Future Fund Bill 2023 and two others - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal action on public housing” which Nita Green could have attended.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Jun 2020, 12:00 PM – Senate Motions - Covid-19 - Housing and renters' rights |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nita Green has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.