We can't say anything concrete about how Murray Watt voted on getting rid of the Gold Travel Pass
How Murray Watt voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should get rid of the Gold Travel Pass, which gives free domestic air travel to certain former politicians, such as former Prime Ministers
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for getting rid of the Gold Travel Pass” which Murray Watt could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Murray Watt on this policy.
| Division | Murray Watt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Feb 2017, 5:48 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Get rid of gold pass |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for getting rid of the Gold Travel Pass” which Murray Watt could have attended.
| Division | Murray Watt | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Feb 2017, 7:10 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Gold Pass travel entitlement |
absent | Yes |
16th Feb 2017, 6:43 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Prime ministers |
absent | Yes |
16th Feb 2017, 6:18 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Former PMs and the gold pass |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Murray Watt was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.