We can't say anything concrete about how Matthew Canavan voted on targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups
How Matthew Canavan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should work to address homelessness in specific vulnerable groups, such as older women and First Nations people
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups” which Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan on this policy.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Nov 2024, 1:12 PM – Senate Help to Buy Bill 2023, Help to Buy (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Prioritise certain groups |
absent | Yes |
26th Nov 2024, 1:08 PM – Senate Help to Buy Bill 2023, Help to Buy (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Extend and focus on specific populations |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for targetting homelessness in specific vulnerable groups” which Matthew Canavan could have attended.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2017, 4:44 PM – Senate Motions - Older People and Homelessness - Increase funding |
No | Yes |
13th Sep 2017, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Homelessness - LGBTIQ community |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Matthew Canavan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.