We can't say anything concrete about how Matthew Canavan voted on supporting weapons manufacturing in Australia
How Matthew Canavan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide financial support for the Australian weapons manufacturing industry
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for supporting weapons manufacturing in Australia” which Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan on this policy.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for supporting weapons manufacturing in Australia” which Matthew Canavan could have attended.
| Division | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Feb 2018, 12:05 PM – Senate Motions - Defence Industry - Do not support |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Matthew Canavan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.