Compare how Matthew Canavan and Rachel Siewert voted on refugee family reunification

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for refugee family reunification” which either Matthew Canavan or Rachel Siewert could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan and Rachel Siewert on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matthew Canavan	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
19th Mar 2015, 1:58 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Family protection visas	Yes	No	No
17th Jul 2014, 2:21 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Migration Amendment (2014 Measures No. 1) Regulation 2014 - Disallow	No	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for refugee family reunification” which either Matthew Canavan or Rachel Siewert could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matthew Canavan	Rachel Siewert	Supporters vote
19th Mar 2015 – Senate Migration Amendment (Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea	absent	No	No