Compare how Matthew Canavan and David Fawcett voted on a Royal Commission into banking

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which either Matthew Canavan or David Fawcett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan and David Fawcett on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matthew Canavan	David Fawcett	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which either Matthew Canavan or David Fawcett could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Matthew Canavan	David Fawcett	Supporters vote
28th Jun 2018, 12:25 PM – Senate Motions - Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry - Funding and farmers	absent	absent	Yes
19th Apr 2016, 7:47 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Royal Commission into banking sector	No	absent	Yes
19th Apr 2016, 6:41 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Establish a Royal Commission	No	No	Yes
24th Jun 2015 – Senate Committees — Financial Services	absent	No	Yes