Compare how Matthew Canavan and David Fawcett voted on increasing workplace protections
Matthew Canavan
Liberal National Party Senator for Queensland since July 2014
David Fawcett
Liberal Party Senator for SA since July 2011
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase protections for workers by, for example, ensuring there are adequate dispute resolution processes available
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which either Matthew Canavan or David Fawcett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan and David Fawcett on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Matthew Canavan | David Fawcett | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which either Matthew Canavan or David Fawcett could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".