We can't say anything concrete about how Gerard Rennick voted on increasing consumer protections
How Gerard Rennick voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases consumer protections by, for example, encouraging competition
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which Gerard Rennick could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gerard Rennick on this policy.
| Division | Gerard Rennick | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing consumer protections” which Gerard Rennick could have attended.
| Division | Gerard Rennick | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th May 2021, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Banking and Financial Services - Protect consumers |
absent | Yes |
2nd Dec 2020, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Banking and Financial Services - Keep responsible lending obligations |
absent | Yes |
10th Feb 2020, 9:48 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 Measures No. 2) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Limit the exemption |
absent | Yes |
12th Nov 2019, 1:07 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2019 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Gerard Rennick has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.