We can't say anything concrete about how Gerard Rennick voted on ending immigration detention on Nauru
How Gerard Rennick voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Nauru Regional Processing Centre and stop all Nauru-based processing of people's claims for asylum
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Gerard Rennick could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gerard Rennick on this policy.
| Division | Gerard Rennick | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2023, 5:15 PM – Senate Motions - Instrument of Designation of the Republic of Nauru as a Regional Processing Country |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Gerard Rennick could have attended.
| Division | Gerard Rennick | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Mar 2023, 10:01 AM – Senate Migration Amendment (Evacuation to Safety) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Gerard Rennick was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.