Compare how Gerard Rennick and James Paterson voted on decreasing the gender pay gap

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which either Gerard Rennick or James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gerard Rennick and James Paterson on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Gerard Rennick James Paterson Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which either Gerard Rennick or James Paterson could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Gerard Rennick James Paterson Supporters vote

6th Mar 2023, 12:18 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Amendment (Improvements for Families and Gender Equality) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Parental leave and the superannuation guarantee

absent absent Yes

23rd Jun 2021, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Discrimination - Against affirmative action

No absent No

8th Dec 2020, 4:53 PM – Senate Motions - Women's Economic Security - Retirement incomes

No absent Yes

26th Aug 2020, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Inequality

No No Yes

20th Sep 2018, 12:33 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Gender gap + low income earners

- No Yes