We can't say anything concrete about how Fraser Anning voted on transgender rights
How Fraser Anning voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the rights of transgender people (including genderfluid, nonbinary and genderqueer people) by amending laws and policies to support healthy lives by, for example, ensuring that appropriate healthcare is available nationwide and that trans people are protected from discrimination and harassment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Fraser Anning could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning on this policy.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender rights” which Fraser Anning could have attended.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2018, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - Gender and Sexual Orientation - Healthcare and gender diverse treatment |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2018, 12:37 PM – Senate Motions - Free Speech - Against gender neutral language |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Fraser Anning was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.