We can't say anything concrete about how Fraser Anning voted on increasing political transparency
How Fraser Anning voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Fraser Anning could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Fraser Anning on this policy.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Fraser Anning could have attended.
| Division | Fraser Anning | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2018, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Political Donations - Increase disclosure requirements |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2018, 12:06 PM – Senate Motions - Donations to Political Parties - Disclosure |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Fraser Anning has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.