We can't say anything concrete about how Brett Mason voted on withdrawing troops from Afghanistan
How Brett Mason voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should begin to withdraw Australian troops from Afghanistan as soon as safely possible
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan” which Brett Mason could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brett Mason on this policy.
Division | Brett Mason | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for withdrawing troops from Afghanistan” which Brett Mason could have attended.
Division | Brett Mason | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
14th Mar 2012, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Afghanistan - Safe withdrawal + increase in civilian aid |
absent | Yes |
31st Oct 2011 – Senate Matters of Urgency - Afghanistan - Confirm withdrawal date |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Brett Mason was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.