We can't say anything concrete about how Brett Mason voted on increasing funding for legal aid
How Brett Mason voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Brett Mason could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Brett Mason on this policy.
| Division | Brett Mason | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Brett Mason could have attended.
| Division | Brett Mason | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Mar 2015, 1:18 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Aid- Increase funding |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Brett Mason has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.