We can't say anything concrete about how Anthony Chisholm voted on building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia
How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make sure that a planned fleet of 12 new submarines is built in South Australia (this new fleet was proposed in 2013 to replace the existing Collins Class submarine fleet)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Feb 2020, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - Collins Class Submarines - Current sustainment model |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anthony Chisholm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.