We can't say anything concrete about how Anthony Chisholm voted on an Australian bill of rights
How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the government should introduce an Australian bill of rights either as a piece of legislation or as part of the Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an Australian bill of rights” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.
| Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Dec 2019, 3:58 PM – Senate Motions - Racism - Introduce an Australian Charter of Rights |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anthony Chisholm was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.