We can't say anything concrete about how Anthony Chisholm voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
How Anthony Chisholm voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anthony Chisholm on this policy.
Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Anthony Chisholm could have attended.
Division | Anthony Chisholm | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
22nd Nov 2021, 5:32 PM – Senate Committees - Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference - Great Barrier Reef |
absent | Yes |
10th Aug 2021, 3:53 PM – Senate Documents - Minister for the Environment - Order for the Production of Documents |
Yes | Yes |
27th Feb 2020, 12:31 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Climate change |
absent | Yes |
3rd Dec 2019, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Climate change |
absent | Yes |
24th Jul 2019, 3:47 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Protect from climate change |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2018, 4:46 PM – Senate Motions - East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery - Add conditions to accreditation |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Anthony Chisholm has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.